On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > Thanks! > > Since we need to get moving towards release, I pushed them both. > > Regards, > > /Pete > > PS: I'm switching to using "OS X:" rather than "Darwin:" as the prefix > for the platform, as I think it'll provide higher visibility for Apple > folks. Yeah, I know that technically Darwin is more correct than OS X, > just like GNU/Linux is more correct than Linux, but there is such thing > as de-facto and popular usage for designations, inaccurate as they may be. > > PPS: If I forget, please remind me to add Vegard and Federico to the > AUTHORS file before release.
As per further discussion in libusb mailing list, the 2nd patch is actually flawed. Still it is better than the original codes. So we can leave it in and have further patches to fix this issue. Ref: http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/libusb-165-Darwin-submit-iso-transfer-assumes-HS-device-td5711532.html#none -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
