On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > Also, if you create and assign issues to be fixed to 1.0.15, then of > course I'm going to be reluctant to go to 1.0.15 without fixing them. > That's partially why I delayed the release again when you added the Ext > Descriptors issue on that list: the more you add, the more delayed the > release.
That is certainly true. The thing is that if I see the date being shift back, I tend to add new things. :-) I have removed some of the Mac OS X thingy from 1.0.15. They are good to have but not necessary. But I will still try to see if I can generate patches against libusbx.git based on Nathan's tree for some of the Darwin patches. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
