2013/6/27 Tim Roberts <t...@probo.com>: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> You're right, and I'm sorry. I guess I'm to much of a rero person sometimes. >> >> Although win32 is far from my specialty I think the attach patch should fix >> it. Any chance you could give it a try? > > This is micro-optimization, of course, but it would be more efficient to > do this instead: > fputs(str, stderr);
I also agree. Maybe Pete missed your email. Attached is the commit for this change. Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
0001-Core-use-fputs-3-instead-of-fprintf-3.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
