On 02/02/2012 01:28 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Laine Stump <la...@laine.org
<mailto:la...@laine.org>> wrote:
On 02/02/2012 09:30 AM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
Libvirt has a function virNetDevBridgeRemovePort() which can
remove port from the Linux Bridge, but it seems that no one
calls it.
Wanted to confirm if port removal happens automatically for Linux
Bridges if VM goes down?
* when it's time to detach the device or destroy the guest,
libvirt just sends a monitor command to qemu, which ends up
closing the tap device. Because the tap device was non-persistent,
that automatically leads to 1) removal of the tap device from the
bridge, and 2) deletion of the tap device itself.
Yeah, the problem is that OVS does not do 1) when tap device gets
destroyed.
Interesting. So what happens if there is traffic for a port on the
switch that has a now-nonexistent tap device? Does it ignore it? Explode?
If a non-persistent tap device that is attached to an OVS is
closed, does OVS not notice this and automatically detach it? You
may want to experiment with that; possibly nothing is needed.
(it would be much better if not, because otherwise there will need
to be special care taken to prevent dangling tap devices (or
dangling references to deleted tap devices))
The difference between OVS and
Linux Bridge is that OVS will need a hook that removes all
ports on
VM shutdown event (and maybe also for some other events?).
Not just when a guest is shutdown, but also if a network device is
detached from a running domain.
If it's necessary to explicitly detach the tap from the OVS,
whatever hook is added in to do that can hopefully just as well be
identical for a Linux bridge (i.e., the only OVS-specific code
should be in the lowest level function that does that bridge detach).
Another point - since a shutdown initiated by the guest would
likely end up destroying the tap device, we can't just add in a
hook to detach it from the bridge - too early and the guest won't
be done with it yet, too late and it will already not exist. I'm
thinking that instead we may need to create the tap as persistent,
then explicitly detach it from the bridge and delete it after the
domain is finished with it.
It wouldn't be too late. It's ok If actual tap device is not alive
anymore.
Well, as long as there are no negative consequences to the port being
assigned past the time when the tap device is deleted.
As I mentioned before, you should modify virNetDevBridgeRemovePort to do
this removal (and do it appropriately depending on the type of bridge),
but change it so that it should return success if it would fail simply
because the tap device already is not on the bridge. (This way we can
leave the tap device as non-persistent, and it will be an effective NOP
for tap devices on linux bridges.
Also, for consistency we should be just always calling the function to
detach from the bridge if virDomainNetGetActualType(net) ==
VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_BRIDGE, regardless of whether it's a linux bridge or
ovs.
As far as where to put the calls to this - look for where there are
calls to networkReleaseActualDevice(), and do it up above that (for
example, you can see in qemuDomainDetachNetDevice() how there is an "if
virDomainNetGetActualType(detach) == VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_DIRECT)" - you
can change that to a switch(actualtype), and add a case for
VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_BRIDGE that calls virNetDevBridgeRemovePort().
If that is needed, I think it should be done in a separate patch
that is a prerequisite to the OVS patch. That way the two things
can be tested independent of each other.
As soon as I get out the patch I'm working on now, I'll take a
quick look at this and see if I can point your more in the right
direction for this prerequisite patch. In the meantime, it would
be useful if you could do the experiment I mentioned above (i.e.
do nothing and see if it explodes), and modify
virNetDevBridgeRemovePort for your patch to do the right thing in
the case of the bridge device being an OVS.
If by experiment you meant "Whether OVS automatically detaches tap
device from OVS bridge when tap device gets closed?" then I can
confirm that in contrast to Linux Bridge it does not do that. I will
look into possibilities to remove ports on "detach-interface" and "VM
shutdown" events.
"detach-interface" = qemuDomainDetachNetDevice() - see above.
"VM shutdown" = qemuProcessStop() - almost exactly the same situation as
detach (turn the if() into a switch() and add a case for bridged devices).
Don't forget LXC support! :-) It can use bridge network devices too.
There are a few other places where it may be appropriate to do the
bridge removal during error paths; this same search may show you some of
them, and some others may show up when you search for where
virNetDevTapCreateInBridgePort.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
