On 8/6/07, Ross Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say there's too much good code in there to just throw it away - a lot > of the current code works well, and is tested to at least some extent. > Plus, there seem to be a lot of patches floating around again. > > In terms of moving forward, IMO it'd be worth making reference to > ruby-xml-smart, which does some of what we do, without the bugs... > http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/ruby-xml-smart/
Cool, looks like they made some progress since I last looked at it. Yes, that's good to know about --its not a full binding, not intended to be, but could still be a good resource. > cvs2svn would be great, but I think it's best to have filesystem access to > the repository. I'm pretty sure it's running on rubyforge already though, > since I've converted other projects from CVS without (IIRC) losing the > history, but I think you'd have to ask Tom to run it cross-project... Oh, cool. I'll ask Tom if he can do that. If he can, we should be all set. If not, well we can just start with a fresh repo. I don't think it matters too too much. T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
