license-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Ryan Birmingham
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Nigel T
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives Eric S. Raymond
  • [License-discuss] Early uses of the term open source (was: "Fairness" vs. mission objectives) Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] A wild co-founder appears Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] A wild co-founder appears Eric S. Raymond
• [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric Schultz
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Johnny A. Solbu
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble JBC offsite
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Jim Jagielski
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Antoine Thomas
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Stefano Zacchiroli
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Brendan Hickey
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Jim Jagielski
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Gil Yehuda via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Seth David Schoen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric Schultz
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric Schultz
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Johnny A. Solbu
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric S. Raymond
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Chris Lamb
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Eric Schultz
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Please be kind Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Russell Nelson
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Grahame Grieve
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Ethical open source licensing - Persona non Grata Preamble Russell Nelson
• [License-discuss] GDPR/CCPA and CAL Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] GDPR/CCPA and CAL Ben Tilly
• [License-discuss] MIT-Clone: Copyright notice Jasper Horn
  • Re: [License-discuss] MIT-Clone: Copyright notice Lukas Atkinson
  • Re: [License-discuss] MIT-Clone: Copyright notice Gil Yehuda via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] MIT-Clone: Copyright notice Rick Moen
• Re: [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Molly de Blanc
  • [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Nigel T
• [License-discuss] OSD and Compulsory User Reporting Ryan Birmingham
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSD and Compulsory User Reporting Chris Lamb
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSD and Compulsory User Reporting Johnny A. Solbu
• [License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium Philippe Ombredanne
• [License-discuss] ZFS Kernel Code on Linux Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] ZFS Kernel Code on Linux John Cowan
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] AGPL timeline Pamela Chestek
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] AGPL timeline & why cautious processes with real-world testing are better (was Re: For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)) Pamela Chestek
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) zak
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) James
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4) Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] On dual-licensing Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] On dual-licensing Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] On dual-licensing Dirk Riehle
  • Re: [License-discuss] On dual-licensing Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] On dual-licensing John Cowan
• [License-discuss] Question regarding licensing Marios Constantinou
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question regarding licensing Philippe Ombredanne
• [License-discuss] Nov. 2019 License-Discuss & License-Review Summaries Patrick Masson
• [License-discuss] October 2019 License Discuss Summary Patrick Masson
• [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years Martin L via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years Antoine Thomas
  • Re: [License-discuss] Becoming Public Domain After X Years Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] Seeking public comments for the OpenChain specification ISO format version 2.1 Gisi, Mark
• Re: [License-discuss] License-discuss Digest, Vol 92, Issue 3 Gustavo G . Mármol
• [License-discuss] Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? gameonlinux
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? Rick Moen
• Re: [License-discuss] OSL, Apache and PrestaShop Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSL, Apache and PrestaShop Antoine Thomas
• [License-discuss] How to embed Apache v2 software? Antoine Thomas
  • Re: [License-discuss] How to embed Apache v2 software? Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] How to embed Apache v2 software? Antoine Thomas
  • Re: [License-discuss] How to embed Apache v2 software? Florian Weimer
• [License-discuss] Feedback on Open-Source Contribution License Simon Fridlund
  • Re: [License-discuss] Feedback on Open-Source Contribution License Brendan Hickey
  • Re: [License-discuss] Feedback on Open-Source Contribution License Tom Callaway
• Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle -- Google's Petition for Certiorari John Cowan
• Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
• Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files (was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Discussion: AGPL and Open Source Definition conflict) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files (was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Discussion: AGPL and Open Source Definition conflict) Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files (was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Discussion: AGPL and Open Source Definition conflict) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files (was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Discussion: AGPL and Open Source Definition conflict) Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files (was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Discussion: AGPL and Open Source Definition conflict) Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Storing source artifacts in ELF files Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Storing source artifacts in ELF files Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] Open Source Software Question. Ahmed Hassan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Software Question. James
  • Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Software Question. Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Software Question. Gil Yehuda via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Software Question. Ahmed Hassan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Software Question. Brendan Hickey
• [License-discuss] GPLv2+ce question - are you forced to make your project open source. richard dagenais
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPLv2+ce question - are you forced to make your project open source. Mike Milinkovich
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPLv2+ce question - are you forced to make your project open source. Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPLv2+ce question - are you forced to make your project open source. B Galliart
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPLv2+ce question - are you forced to make your project open source. Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPLv2+ce question - are you forced to make your project open source. Florian Weimer
• Re: [License-discuss] WordPress GPL software zak
  • Re: [License-discuss] WordPress GPL software Johnny A. Solbu
  • Re: [License-discuss] WordPress GPL software Florian Weimer
  • Re: [License-discuss] WordPress GPL software Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] WordPress GPL software zak
  • Re: [License-discuss] WordPress GPL software Bruce Perens via License-discuss
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday [Maxis Confidential] Ismawy Bin Ismail
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Gil Yehuda
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Gil Yehuda
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Gil Yehuda
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Russell McOrmond
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Coherent Open Source - Getting underway next Friday Lawrence Rosen
• [License-discuss] License for 'source available' software without ability to create clones of the software? ALIEN Quake
  • Re: [License-discuss] License for 'source available' software without ability to create clones of the software? Kevin P. Fleming
• [License-discuss] GPL-3.0's anti-DRM tivoization clause Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPL-3.0's anti-DRM tivoization clause Johnny A. Solbu
  • Re: [License-discuss] GPL-3.0's anti-DRM tivoization clause Moritz Maxeiner
• Re: [License-discuss] The Right of Display Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] The Right of Display John Cowan
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) VanL
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2) Bruce Perens via License-discuss
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] The Right of Display Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] The Right of Display Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] The Right of Display John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] The Right of Display Russell McOrmond
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] The Right of Display John Cowan
• [License-discuss] Fair Use Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fair Use Florian Weimer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages