Quoting John Richter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I ask this because this requirement puts companies with "ethical > practices" rules in a strange position. A company might have a rule > saying that it won't do business with companies that use sweatshop > labor, for example. They couldn't release any code they wrote as open > source, because to do so could violate their ethical practices rule (a > sweatshop-using company might decide to use their open source > accounting software, for example).
Please pardon a (mayhap) silly question: How could it be considered "doing business" for an unknown third party to independently decide to use one's software without any kind of exchange transaction? -- Cheers, "Don't use Outlook. Outlook is really just a security Rick Moen hole with a small e-mail client attached to it." [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Brian Trosko in r.a.sf.w.r-j -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
