Roberto Bonino scripsit: > If I understand correctly, by licensing under GPL, I would forbid > the schema to be used by any software that is not licensed under > GPL. Therefore a commercial program could not use it.
No, that overstates the case. If the schema is *incorporated* into the software, such as by being stored in a string in memory or the like, then the software would have to be licensed under the GPL. But GPLed software can *act on* files that are not GPLed. Otherwise, using emacs to edit a file would imply that the file was automatically under the GPL, which is *not* the case. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --_The Hobbit_ -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
