On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:05:13PM +0200, Eugene Paskevich wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:32:18 +0200, Philipp Kolmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >since we use svn as versioning tool, wouldn't it make sense to change the > > > >Makefile.cvs > >to > >Makefile.svn > > Frankly, I'd replace those Makefiles in favour of a simple sh bootstrap > script, which of course should be removed before making distfile. > > I can see no reason in using Makefiles in order to check for admin module > presence and running make for a common Makefile from it. > > Moreover, running ./build is just simpler than running make -f > Makefile.cvs... ;-))
Makes sense. Got my vote for this approach! Philipp -- The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog!
