There are benefits to both approaches. I prefer the partial function composition, but annotations on Pojos have their place. Wait a few days, and I think there'll be some very good news on this front.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I've been taking a look at Jersey and how it operates with Lift by way > of the recent integration that cropped up on dev.java.net... > > From my perspective, I see how having a standard RS service framework > could be helpful, but it appears to bypass important lift concepts > like SiteMap etc so I'm just wondering what the benefit of using such > a layer would be over using DispatchPF etc to create REST services or > serving xml fragments for templates? (I have no idea about Jersey > apart from the basic docs ive read, so if im missing a major benefit > id love to hear discuss) > > Cheers for any thoughts > > Tim > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
