There are benefits to both approaches.  I prefer the partial function
composition, but annotations on Pojos have their place.
Wait a few days, and I think there'll be some very good news on this front.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote:

>
> Hey guys,
>
> I've been taking a look at Jersey and how it operates with Lift by way
> of the recent integration that cropped up on dev.java.net...
>
> From my perspective, I see how having a standard RS service framework
> could be helpful, but it appears to bypass important lift concepts
> like SiteMap etc so I'm just wondering what the benefit of using such
> a layer would be over using DispatchPF etc to create REST services or
> serving xml fragments for templates? (I have no idea about Jersey
> apart from the basic docs ive read, so if im missing a major benefit
> id love to hear discuss)
>
> Cheers for any thoughts
>
> Tim
> >
>


-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to