See David's last post on this thread, and the updated diff on RB. ------------------------------------- Jeppe Nejsum Madsen<je...@ingolfs.dk> wrote:
Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> writes: > Would it be a bad idea to use java.util.Date for now, and if and when support > is added for JodaTime, change it to a DateHolder (which would be added then)? Haven't looked in detail, but wouldn't this require two changes to client code? 1) One to use the new ConversionRules 2) One when DateHolder is introduced If so, I suggest we take the hit now to allow for a seamless (if such a thing exists :-) change to JodaTime /Jeppe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
