Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Perhaps somebody-not-Mark could write the instructions in CG 1.3,
then a Frogmeister-not-Mark could proofread those instructions and
add whatever else is needed.
If you want to rename the section, go ahead. If you want to
suggest a different location fine; I haven't really thought about
where to put it. The important thing at the moment is just to get
it... I'll be reviewing the CG in a few days, anyway.
... actually, the *most* important thing at the moment is to get
into the habit of using the CG, both for writing and reading.
Great points.
It seems to me, though, that there is a time for discussing stuff on the
mail lists until the answers get settled.
Once the answers are settled, then they should go in the CG.
So I think we're right on the edge of it being time to put it in the CG.
So, Jon, will you be somebody-not-Mark, and I'll be Frogmeister-not-mark?
Yep, sounds good. Would you prefer that I send text for review and
then create the patch when we like it, or should I just create a
patch to be reviewed?
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
