On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:04:17PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > So, having read the past discussion and looked through source code etc. > it seems like there are several general observations, some conclusions, > and some questions. > > Observations: > > (1) Lilypond isn't violating any copyright/license requirements.
So what's the point of this discussion? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
