Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I think having to sign paperwork (esp. having your employer sign > something) is something that puts a big barrier up for potential > contributors. I am not sure it is worth the effort.
I would not want to see users in general having to sign a contributor agreement or any such. What does seem like a good idea is moving existing code from 'v2 only' to 'v2 or later' (or v3 if desired), because that takes a lot of the sting out of potential future license upgrade decisions. I don't know whether that needs formal paperwork or whether emailed permission will suffice (again, allowing for the fact that LP contributors are most likely not interested in suing over such factors:-) _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
