On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Hans Aberg <hab...@math.su.se> wrote: > RMS says he thinks it is better using artificial examples, not risking a > lawsuit when it is so easy to avoid and still have good results.
1) I don't care what RMS says. 2) We were *never* going to use a Stockhausen example in the lilypond docs anyway. 3) This whole thread is stupid and pointless and stupid. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
