On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:30:35PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > > There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to > > wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back > > in a few months. > > Why? ... > AFAICS, the script works fine. Neil isn't yet satisfied, but he hasn't > identified any weaknesses; he's just expressed a vague concern.
I'm content to interpret silence as consent for most changes, but changing the indentation of multiple files is a relatively destructive policy. 1) almost any existing patch to scheme files will break 2) it makes the git history harder to look through (unless you use the git --ignore-whitespace option) I think we should be conservative about indentation policies; we shouldn't rush forwards if a main developer has concerns. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
