David Kastrup writes: > The main problem is that it is catastrophic with regard to rebasing, and > still rather disruptive with regard to merging.
+1 > Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating > real problems. +1 Also, I'm not going to start the C++ indentation discussion all over again. I did not read this proposal as I figured that it would do the only sensible thing: formalise the status quo while allowing people who are not using Emacs yet to indent their files the GNU way using a script. We're a GNU project, remember? Please find an indenter that does what Emacs does. Most every .scm is indented by Emacs now. And please, pretty please, give Emacs another try. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
