2011/9/15 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to > wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back > in a few months.
That's strange, i had a vague feeling that the last status was a bit of LGTMs and lots of silence, but... 2011/9/15 Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com>: > Am Thursday, 15. September 2011, 14:47:30 schrieb Ian Hulin: >> On 15/09/11 09:19, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> > I'd rather interpret no action as tacit approval. As your >> > electronics colleague once said, "Just do it." :) >> > >> > Trevor >> >> 1+ > > +1 ++ 2011/9/15 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating > real problems. It is not like we are talking about fixing > machine-generated sources without indentation here. Sources _are_ > readable, they just don't look quite uniform. But I think that the > non-whitespace parts of our code offer enough and more significant > opportunities for cleanup work. i'd love to see more comments in the code! Currently i have hard time reading note-collision.cc - after more than an hour i still only have a vague idea what's going on there. If anyone'd like to explain this, i'd be greatful! I cannot write a good fix for 1546 until i understand note-collision.cc cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
