On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <gra...@percival-music.ca> > >On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > >>I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object? > > > >yes; I'd rather see an issue in the tracker instead. > > Can I suggest that this is rather overkill for an update to the CG? > I'd not disagree at all over notation ref, or code, but the CG isn't > supposed to be finely crafted words, it's supposed to be a quick > source of reference for contributors. You'll note that I thought > pushing directly to it was OK when I added stuff about regtest > comparisons. I think this is the same.
oh, sorry, I was unclear. I don't want to see this bug documented in the CG; I want to see this bug fixed. It's going to be a 1-3 line fix to some build file. I'm optimistic that this can be achieved within a week. As such, I don't want an extra note in the CG that we'll have to remove in a few days. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
