Hello, On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" >> <gra...@percival-music.ca> >> >On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: >> >>I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object? >> > >> >yes; I'd rather see an issue in the tracker instead. >> >> Can I suggest that this is rather overkill for an update to the CG? >> I'd not disagree at all over notation ref, or code, but the CG isn't >> supposed to be finely crafted words, it's supposed to be a quick >> source of reference for contributors. You'll note that I thought >> pushing directly to it was OK when I added stuff about regtest >> comparisons. I think this is the same. > > oh, sorry, I was unclear. I don't want to see this bug documented > in the CG; I want to see this bug fixed. It's going to be a 1-3 > line fix to some build file. I'm optimistic that this can be > achieved within a week. As such, I don't want an extra note in > the CG that we'll have to remove in a few days. > > Cheers, > - Graham >
if it is of any use, the last 3 patches I have just tested for David, none gave me make failures at all. I even did two of them again twice, just to see if it was a fluke. So it seems to be the 'type' of files that get patched perhaps that generate this oddity? Reitveld issues 5023044, 5090045, 5083045. regards -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel