I'm trying to implement beams, but I get this message: "must have Item for spanner bound of Beam"
What does this refer to? A On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:29 AM, <bordage.bertr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's the second part of my review. I saw that kievan notation has > beams, contrary to what I thought. If you're intrepid, you can also try > to implement the kievan beaming parameters in you KievanVoice. > > Hold on, it's the end! > Bertrand > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf > File mf/parmesan-clefs.mf (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/mf/parmesan-clefs.mf#newcode1738 > mf/parmesan-clefs.mf:1738: % TODO: merge this code with the above > Obviously, this must be done. This is easy, you just have to define the > glyph and create two characters with it: > > > def draw_kievan_do_clef = > z1 = [...] > [...] > enddef; > > fet_beginchar ([...]); > draw_kievan_do_clef; > fet_endchar; > > fet beginchar ([...]_change"); > % TODO: make a different glyph for changes, but > % dunno what a kievan clef looks like in changes... > draw[...]; > endchar; > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/mf/parmesan-noteheads.mf > File mf/parmesan-noteheads.mf (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/mf/parmesan-noteheads.mf#newcode1861 > mf/parmesan-noteheads.mf:1861: fet_beginchar ("kievan half note (space > position)", "s1rkievan"); > Still "sr1kievan". > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/scm/output-lib.scm > File scm/output-lib.scm (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode101 > scm/output-lib.scm:101: (min 2 > Maybe you could try to change "min 2" for "min 3" and remove what you > added before. I'm totally unsure of that, we must check what's going on > downstream to be sure. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/64002/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode595 > scm/output-lib.scm:595: (0 . "accidentals.vaticana0") > I guess there's no natural glyph in kievan notation since there is no > time signature and no accidental 'remembering'. Can you confirm this? > Maybe we need to remove this line, then. This will produce a warning > (but no crash) if one tries to use a natural in kievan style. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/ > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel