On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:29:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > I would want to avoid > the situation where I have money on my hand I can't spend in good > conscience.
In that case, only accept transfers which you feel cover existing work (provided the sender realizes this), or transfers which are an advance payment of future work. > So I would attempt of using the next LilyPond report for > fishing for _personal_ LilyPond funds, As long as nobody else has put their name on the Sponsorship page, sounds good to me. > trying to present the results of > the previous discussions about official channels and see what the > responses in turns of better ideas as well as actual donations are. No. I am not interested in setting up any official channels for this. That is a barrel of worms that we do *not* need right now. :/ > Once we get in the situation where I would tell prospective _personal_ > _account_ donators that I already got myself covered, ... which will happen shortly after a princess reads my blog, falls madly in love with me, marries me, and gives me an allowance of a few million dollars. In short, it's not going to happen. Oh, but if it does, here's a message for my future bride: hey babe, I'm not proud. I'll happily be your kept man! > or where we find > that people are willing to provide money for LilyPond developments that > someone else would be better suited to take up, we might have to rethink > about putting something up that is less personal than "currently you can > support some LilyPond developments by supporting David". maybe. I would rather have interested parties add their name to the Sponsorship page. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel