On Apr 17, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Could we sum up the discussion?
> As I understand: for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
> {
> }
>
> is ok, right? I will wait for two OKs and then make changes and produce and
> upload a patch.
>
> Łukasz
>
LGTM.
Before you tackle this, I'd strongly recommend asking Han Wen why the flip (&d)
business is there in the first place - it could be that he opted for the `do'
loop over a macro for a precise reason that could prove to be important.
Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
