Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
>> On 14 April 2012 16:25, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:
>
> oops, that should be "we propose that we use these direction
> loops"
>
>> > for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
>> > { ... }
>> > for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
>> > { ... }
>>
>> Ok, I'll do so.
>
> Not yet. I just wanted to clarify what you were talking about,
> since most people don't have the time to go trawling through
> rietveld discussions. If something is difficult to understand,
> the first instinct is just to ignore the discussion.
Is this supposed to declare d itself or not?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
