On 15 April 2012 16:49, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Łukasz Czerwiński <milimet...@gmail.com> writes: > > I'd like to write code, that will make Lilypond better or easier to be > > used > > Not necessarily the same as "the C++ way". >
Right :) No iterators needed here :) > > and it's not my goal to fulfill my ambitions to force unwanted > > changes, so: > > > > 1) As Graham and Keith wanted for(UP_and_DOWN), the macro and example > > is: > > > > #define UP_and_DOWN(d) \ > > Direction d = UP; d != CENTER; flip(&d), d == UP ? d = CENTER : d > > That looks rather nonsensical. Why use flip at all here, and what with > the obscure : d as a nop? You could write > > ; d = d == UP ? DOWN : CENTER ; Yeah, you're absolutely right, that way is simpler, thanks :) Łukasz
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
