----- Original Message -----
From: Łukasz Czerwiński
To: James
Cc: m...@apollinemike.com ; k-ohara5...@oco.net ; David Kastrup ;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:41 PM
Subject: Lilypond patchy and other Lilypond problems
Still requires 'someone' to 'do' something and then say 'LGTM' and I
don't know what the feed back has been with regard to the
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/grand-regression-test-checking.html
is this just not the same thing in essence?
Woow, what's that:Â http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtests/Â for? Is
it for rating regression tests or for rating that particular result of a
particular test run?
Ĺukasz
OK. Regtest checking can mean three things. 1) Between releases, comparing
the output of the regtests with what they looked like before and flagging
any differences as potential problems. I do this. 2) Doing the same thing
for patches. Patchy does this, helped by a human, currently James and was
David. 3) Checking that the regtests themselves are OK - well described and
functional. The grand regtest checking project does this, hosted on my
server and using my web code. We're doing well. If you log in and check a
few, you can see the statistics.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
