Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the second part of your message.
Thank you again! 2012/5/21 David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> > Hi José, > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani <zepadovani.li...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu: >> >> \override Stem #'extra-offset = >>> #(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP) >>> '(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25))) >>> >> >> Hello David, >> >> thank you very much! >> >> Now I see that ly:stem::calc-direction only gives me the standard Stem >> direction, but if I am using some \stemDown or \stemUp before the note, the >> lambda function will ignore the actual direction of the Stem and adjust >> stem offsets accordingly to the standard direction. >> >> Do you (or anybody else) know a way to access the actual direction of the >> Stem? >> > > Yes, in this instance the second option I gave (using ly:grob-property to > look up 'direction) will give you the proper direction after a \stemUp or > \stemDown. > > -David >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
