> I think there's still a need for a "event
> after the previous duration", i.e.
>
> c'1-{ s4 s\< s2 <>\! }
> c'1-{ s4 s\< s2 z\! }
Mhmm. If we have
<anchor>-{ <skip1> <skip2> ... <skipn> <skipx> }
with
duration(<skip1>) + duration(<skip2>) + ... duration(<skipn>) =
duration(<anchor>)
then <skipx> can have an arbitrary duration, which is ignored, and
only its post-event is taken into account. I really don't see an
immediate need for `z'. It would only make sense to introduce `z' if
there are other situations to use it.
> c'1\at{ s4 s\< s2 z\! }
This looks like being possible to realize with a music function...
Actually, this would satisfy my syntax sugar needs.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
