> On May 20, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> (3. A mostly-trivial poetic bonus: regular and relative are easy to
>> remember as a pair because the alliteration of them both starting
>> with “re".)
>
> Bonus? Only native English speakers think along such lines, I
> reckon :-)
>
> I strongly vote against \regular in this context. It's far too easy
> to confuse it with \relative.
:-) Fair enough, at least it did occur to me that this cuts both ways and
could be seen as a negative.
If not “regular” then maybe there's something else along the lines of "the
default entry mode” as with plain {…}. \default is already taken… I guess
there's \standard but I don’t suppose it would fare any better than \regular.
Anyway, we already have some good options on the table. I guess you can’t
fault us for not considering all the possibilities, and at least there’s
agreement that this is a useful feature.
-Paul
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
