>>> See the line above which is in CMU Concrete! > >> ??? I use Emacs to read my e-mail, and emacs is configured to use >> the font 'DejaVu Sans Mono' on my GNU/Linux box. This font >> contains Cyrillic glyphs... > > I composed that line in the email using CMU Concrete. Presumably > your email client changes that.
You have (correctly) sent a plain text e-mail, which doesn't preserve any font information... >> None of those fonts contain Cyrillic glyphs. > > OK, that's fine by me. I was confused as earlier emails referred to > the font family, Just for clarification. A font family 'Foo' traditionally consists of 'Foo Regular', 'Foo Bold', 'Foo Italic', and 'Foo Bold Italic'. Some font families contain *much* more series – Computer Modern (CM) is such an example[1] – others contain only a single one. The PDFs as produced by texinfo use CM (plus some other, additional fonts, as mentioned in a previous e-mail). Note that 'CMU Concrete' is a completely different thing; while based on CM, it is not part of it. With 'part of it' I mean that historically it wasn't part of the fonts that TeX has started many years ago. > not the version of the font that are used in the documentation > project, which you tell me is a subset. What I'm talking about has nothing to do with font versions. Werner [1] To be more precise, CM is a collection of various font families.