>> For me, 'Needs::evidence' is very specific: if someone requests a
>> typographic feature, we need to know whether there exist real-world
>> scores (usually from well-known publishers) that actually use that
>> feature. Issue #828 falls into this category.
>>
>> 'Need:info' would be much broader. If someone opens an issue in
>> the tracker (not following our recommendation to write to
>> bug-lilypond first) and doesn't give a recipe to reproduce the
>> problem, I would set this tag so that we know that the MR is
>> incomplete and probably needs a 'ping'. Issue #6905 falls into
>> this category.
>
> I don't object to Needs:info, but what about Needs:other to avoid
> overlap with the rest of the Needs group?
>
> ... or Needs:response?
> ... or Needs:clarification?
> ... or Needs:triage?
'Needs:clarification' sounds nice to me, but it is a very long tag.
Werner
