[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Are you sure? That looks more like the symbol used to separate > > systems. Do you have a scan of the symbol in action? It's not listed > > in Kurt Stone, and Heussenstam gives a handwriting example, that is > > more vertically sloped and thinner, like two penlines. > > If you look at the end of the standards document above, the > symbol is clearly named ceasura. I'll check the typesetting > books I have at home tonight.
Yes, but the typographical quality of the other symbols in the document do not convince me. The symbol is much to black and heavy to put in a staff. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
