[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I somewhat agree but the choice of fonts chosen for that document should be independent of the unicode value used to represent the caesura. I haven't presently got a better example to show. Maybe someone else does? I would hope that a better example would be generated in the fonts used by Lilypond.
Are you sure? That looks more like the symbol used to separateIf you look at the end of the standards document above, the
systems. Do you have a scan of the symbol in action? It's not listed
in Kurt Stone, and Heussenstam gives a handwriting example, that is
more vertically sloped and thinner, like two penlines.
symbol is clearly named ceasura. I'll check the typesetting
books I have at home tonight.
Yes, but the typographical quality of the other symbols in the document do not convince me. The symbol is much to black and heavy to put in a staff.
Using "//" actually works thanks to Graham ( Thanks! ) but it would be better if it actually claimed some horizontal space for itself instead of just placing itself on top of whatever is there.
Paul
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
