Hi all,

>>> I'm not sure if this is the right time/place/thread, but I think it
would
>>> be easier to have a kind of MusicXML-Light that only contains
information
>>> about notes and lyrics

>>> That first step would make a huge difference.


I think the Music Encoding Initiative has this very thing in mind, amongst
other goals.

I think it's possibly quite relevant to the discussion of Lilypond's
MusicXML support.

http://music-encoding.org/home

piaras


On 15 April 2015 at 16:21, Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> >>> I'm not sure if this is the right time/place/thread, but I think it
> would
> >>> be easier to have a kind of MusicXML-Light that only contains
> information
> >>> about notes and lyrics
>
> That first step would make a huge difference.
>
> >> well, in addition you would surely want slurs, articulations, dynamic
> >> markings, ornaments (anything else that occurs repeatedly throughout the
> >> music that you would not wish to go over adding by hand).
> >
> > This is what I meant with "information about notes and lyrics”.
>
> To piggy-back on my recent “content versus presentation” post, the request
> here is that MusicXML-Light output content [only].
>
> Cheers,
> Kieren.
> _______________________
>
> Kieren MacMillan, composer
> www:  <http://www.kierenmacmillan.info>
> email:  i...@kierenmacmillan.info
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to