Hi Johan, On 29 April 2016 at 18:11, Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl> wrote:
> Well done. Now if David would be so kind to add this as the new subcribers > welcome message. I have some remarks, but since he is the list owner he's > to decide. Is he? We do not know. > Well done, Werner! > Werner’s guidelines are only one personal view and suggestion, and they have not been ‘voted on’ or necessarily accepted yet. I for one think a blend of the Debian mailing lists code of conduct, with additions for lilypond specifics such as MWE’s, non-inline image posting, what to do with code fragments, how to reply to digests and so on is in order. To put my money where my mouth is I am prepared to make a draft recommendation for people to examine. An RFC, no less. :-) Since this is the longest thread in recent memory - interesting because it is a meta-thread really - I wonder if we should consider using some forum type software for lilypond matters? The mailing list has a flat structure, and I have long thought that we ought to have a separate area for Scheme topics, Guile topics, installation issues, engraving questions, and so on and so forth. Such sub specialities which are not of interest to all users could have their own forum topic area. Not a totally crazy idea. And dear me people could use Markdown to format HTML posts. The forum could have the forum guidelines posted permanently as per normal forum software. As to the standard list question who would do the work, I would be happy to. Andrew _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user