Am 29.04.2016 um 12:28 schrieb Federico Bruni: > Il giorno ven 29 apr 2016 alle 10:50, Simon Albrecht > <simon.albre...@mail.de> ha scritto: >> On 29.04.2016 10:11, Johan Vromans wrote: >> > >> >> . Provide a minimal working example (or a minimal not-working >> >> example). The stress lies on *minimal*. This shows us that you >> >> have at least tried to look into the manual before asking. >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_Working_Example >> > Do not include the example in the text, but attach it to the message. >> >> That’s not always sensible or necessary. If the e-mail is plain text >> anyway, then there’s little problem with inline code. > > I think that inline minimal examples are much better: > > - you can easily comment its contents in the reply > - in the archives they appear immediately and you can read them > quickly instead of downloading .bin files >
I think this needs some clarification: Inserting *code* examples within the text is usually very good for communication. I think the suggested ban on inline examples referred to *images* _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user