Hi Richard, Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time to time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing errors.
Even though an old print, it’s pretty miserable music printing for the era all said. Andrew _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
