On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 18:01 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me > these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time > to time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing errors. > > Even though an old print, it’s pretty miserable music printing for the era > all said.
Well I've uploaded my transcription to IMSLP now, so after 306 years there is a LilyPond typeset of it available. It took me nearly two hours to input via Denemo, being so indistinct, but didn't call for any tweaks beyond the clash between the slur and the accidental which you can see in the incipit. (For some reason the incipit doesn't obey the tweak ...) Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
