I like the first and last ones. The first is closer to the web graphic, but I think I prefer the last one.

I still can't get pacman out of my mind ... you don't get that effect with the colour graphic because the colours are wrong, but as soon as it goes b&w ...

Cheers,
Wol

On 05/08/16 13:40, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi All,

Here's tests with the different proposition.
I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet.

Cheers,
Pierre



2016-08-05 14:36 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de
<mailto:a-ko...@a-kobel.de>>:

    Malte,

    I think you did a really nice job there. However, I can't help but
    be reminded of

    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:3_schwarze_Punkte_auf_gelbem_Grund_2.svg
    
<https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:3_schwarze_Punkte_auf_gelbem_Grund_2.svg>
    by the dots in the center... (For those in non-German-speaking
    countries: that's the symbol blind people wear in public as a
    warning for other participants in traffic.)

    Looking at the "original" picture from a distance, I perceive the
    center as only one colored patch. Would you mind trying a version
    with just one dot in the center?


    Best,
    Alexander



    On 2016-08-05 14:01, Malte Meyn wrote:

        Am 05.08.2016 um 13:52 schrieb Marc Hohl:

            Am 05.08.2016 um 11:38 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:


                    Here are some experiments of mine.


                Very nice!

                    logo1.svg is the one I used in the score,
                    logo_outline.svg is the
                    outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to
                    make it simpler.


                I like logo3 most.


            +1


        My favourite is logo2, and I like tyronicus’s idea of only one
        leaf with
        the typical gap and thus made logo4.

        But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here
        is a
        combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less
        detail,
        only one pad but with gap -> more typical).


        _______________________________________________
        lilypond-user mailing list
        lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>
        https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
        <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user>



    _______________________________________________
    lilypond-user mailing list
    lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>
    https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
    <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user>




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to