Am 11.01.2018 um 05:38 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com <mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hi Urs and All,

    A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image.
    All works fine as per the source installations now updated.

    A large vote of thanks to all who untangled this ball of wool.
    Despite a lifetime of software development experience, I kept
    going round in circles and never got it working. A big achievement
    and well done to you all.

    Andrew



    On 7 January 2018 at 20:38, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org
    <mailto:li...@openlilylib.org>> wrote:

        I've done a new iteration on the Wiki page. I've also added a
        concise walkthrough at the end that leaves out all the
        explanations and


    _______________________________________________
    lilypond-user mailing list
    lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>
    https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
    <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user>


It's good to know it's possible. Does anyone know whether a failed installation of Frescobaldi 3 endangers a working 2.20 installation?

It *should* not, but of course that's a risky statement in the context of this thread ;-)

The packages don't affect each other, the point is to cleanly invoke the right Python version with the right entry file and the right python-ly in the pythonpath.

How did you install 2.20 and what OS distribution are you on?

Urs


Vaughan



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to