Am 11.01.2018 um 05:38 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com
<mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Urs and All,
A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image.
All works fine as per the source installations now updated.
A large vote of thanks to all who untangled this ball of wool.
Despite a lifetime of software development experience, I kept
going round in circles and never got it working. A big achievement
and well done to you all.
Andrew
On 7 January 2018 at 20:38, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org
<mailto:li...@openlilylib.org>> wrote:
I've done a new iteration on the Wiki page. I've also added a
concise walkthrough at the end that leaves out all the
explanations and
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user>
It's good to know it's possible. Does anyone know whether a failed
installation of Frescobaldi 3 endangers a working 2.20 installation?
It *should* not, but of course that's a risky statement in the context
of this thread ;-)
The packages don't affect each other, the point is to cleanly invoke the
right Python version with the right entry file and the right python-ly
in the pythonpath.
How did you install 2.20 and what OS distribution are you on?
Urs
Vaughan
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user