Am 09.04.2018 um 23:05 schrieb foxfanfare:
Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote
Urs,
The link provided is nothing like the Chopin Etude #23, Op. 25 No 11 in my
Paderewski edition.
Hofstadter in his book "Goedel, Escher, Bach: The Golden Braid" offers a
mathematical/contrapuntal analysis.
Mark
Because it's Godowsky :-) 53 Studies on Chopin's Etudes ~ 42
I think Mark wanted to indicate that the *original* Chopin study in
Paderewski's (annotated?) edition is even more challenging.
However, when I last looked into it I recall concluding that the
Paderewski edition had *not* been engraved with LilyPond ;-) And this
was the question my link referred to: seeing LilyPond deal with complex
piano music.
I truely love this book... I have two volumes on paper and it is very
inspiring for my work!
Actually, almost every etudes could be an engraving challenge...
And I must admit that the LP result is awesome even if it lacks some
adjustements.
Of course it lacks these. Actually this *is* the point about the
example, how awesome it is without any engraving tweaks.
I read the code but can't understand yet the scheme code yet...
Well, of course this example is especially challenging due to its
non-standard beaming, and the Scheme code basically deals with that. One
should stress the fact that -- all programmer's sophistication
notwithstanding -- the actual layout decisions are purely automatic.
The original engraver should have earn an engraving oscar... (if it existed)
Maybe he's watching this ;-)
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user