Thanks for the reply, Kieren. Although you recommended not to, I'd like to know if there is some documentation about this abstraction (going further than the reference book's "Manual repeat marks"). This situation would help me a lot.
Em ter., 12 de mar. de 2024 às 20:58, Kieren MacMillan < kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> escreveu: > Hi Lucas, > > I was told by people with a far deeper understanding of Lilypond’s than > mine that trying to abstract the volta map is undesireable — it should be > explicitly included in every music expression that it intersects with. > > Cheers, > Kieren. > > > On Mar 12, 2024, at 7:00 PM, Lucas Cavalcanti <lucaspi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello. I've been thinking about Lilypond's usage on parts: for one > musician (for example, the singer singing the melody) I'd like to give them > a score containing voltas using the repeat and volta commands; for another > musician (for example, the drummer) I'd like to give them a score with no > repeats and voltas. I know that if I'd like to create a full-band score > (i.e a grid) I can use the \unfoldRepeats at every variable, creating one > straight through score. > > > > However, is it possible to create something like a "Tempo Map" of sorts? > Like a part/variable that gives instructions to the master grid to create > repeats and voltas without the need to create new parts? > > > > My objective is to figure out a way to create independent grid scores > from musician part scores. To give a singer one straight, 6 pages score, to > give a drummer a 1 page score and to give the conductor a 4 page score. > > Is that possible? > > > > Best regards, Lucas. > > <Question.pdf><Question.ly> > > ______________________________________________ > > My work day may look different than your work day. Please do not feel > obligated to read or respond to this email outside of your normal working > hours. > >
