Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes:
>>>> \repeat tremolo 4 { e32[ c! }
>>>
>>>
>>> Don't you want "\repeat tremolo 2" instead of 4?
>
> Thanks, yes, of course, but the result is still not correct, as you've
> found out.
Very much not correct! This seems like a bug, no? The output is not
only different from intended, it's just plain wrong. Lilypond thinks
the duration is as specified, but that is not what the notation shows.
(Note that asking for manual beams on plain quarter notes elicits a
warning, but the beams are ignored and the output is at least valid.)
\relative c''' {
\time 3/4
a4 b c
\repeat tremolo 4 { e32[ c! }
\repeat tremolo 4 { es c }
\repeat tremolo 4 { d b] }
\repeat tremolo 2 { e32[ c! }
\repeat tremolo 2 { es c] }
\repeat tremolo 2 { e32[ c! }
\repeat tremolo 2 { es c] }
\repeat tremolo 2 { e32[ c! }
\repeat tremolo 2 { es c] }
a4[ b c]
}
-David
