Typesetting: note tied across a clef change

[Knute Snortum]

I have what I guess is a typesetting question.  I am updating an old
manuscript and it has a tied note (an f) across a clef change.  In
LilyPond, it needs to be a tie (see slur-as-tie-across-clefs.png,
attached.)  I don't like it, so I thought I'd move the clef change inside
the measure (see clef-in-middle-of-measure.png) but I'm not sure it's less
confusing than the original.  I was hoping to get some keyboardist's
opinions about the two approaches.

Below is a MWE of the clef-in-the-middle approach in case someone wants to
fool around with it.

Thanks for any feedback.

%%% Start
\version "2.24.4"
\language "english"

leftHandUpper = \relative {
  \voiceThree
  bf4( c2 d4~ |
  d4 ef2 f4~ |
  f4 \clef treble g2 a4~ |
  a4 bf2 c4) |
}

leftHandLower = \relative {
  \voiceTwo
  ef2( f |
  g2 a |
  bf2 \clef treble c |
  d2 ef) |
}

\new Staff {
  \clef bass
  \key ef \major
  <<
    \new Voice \leftHandUpper
    \new Voice \leftHandLower
  >>
}
%%% End

--
Knute Snortum