On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 12:34 PM Robin Bannister <[email protected]> wrote:
> But I now realise that this wiki is unsuitable as a repository for > LSR1098 which provides pseudoIndent [1]. > > A week ago, while I was helping with a harikiri problem, the user's > pseudoIndent code (scraped off the wiki) proved faulty [2]. We resolved > our problem offlist, using pseudoIndent code provided by me. > Is there a reason you did this off-list? Resolving it on the list might help others. > > The pseudoIndent wiki has acquired errors in several places, not just > the .ily code but also the instructions and the demo code. > What errors are these? I scraped the code off the Wiki and ran it without any problems. The stuff currently on the wiki should be taken off without delay. > > The purged wiki page need only provide a link to the update series [3], > but maybe also displaying the demo.pdf would be appropriate. > This seems extreme to me. There is a tab on every Wiki page that shows the revision history. [1] The major revision seems to be formatting and comments. If there is a revision that is detrimental to the page, it can be reverted, but the changes seem worthwhile to me. There is also a discussion page for each Wiki page. Wikis are naturally a little messy, but I don't see any reason to abandon it at this point. [1] https://wiki.lilypond.community/index.php?title=Indenting_individual_systems&action=history -- Knute Snortum
