Hi David, On 7/27/07, David Fedoruk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd better clarify something which is not apparent in the small > amountof score I've posted here. The top voice is the voice which will > continue as the main voice. The lower one, in this case pops in for > two bars, drops out for a bar completely then re-apears for two bars > at which point the notes are stemmed on one stem. So this is sort of > polyphony where it makes sense at the moment from Scarlattii's point > of view.
That's exactly why you should avoid << { } \\ { } >> in this situation, since it creates two new voice contexts which you can't link to the outside world. I wasn't sure how to deal with the creation fo new voices when they > were created so often and dissapears just as often. Do new voices have > to be removed or ended? New voices end automatically in a polyphonic section with the >>, so you needn't worry about their housekeeping - LilyPond creates and destroys them as required. That is why I am doing it this way. > > ------- Code Snip ---------- > > ef[d ef f g af ] | % bar 65 > g[ bf \grace af16 g8 f ef df ]| bar 66 > > > \grace bf16 \stemUp cf2 af'4~ | > \new Voice { \stemDown cf,2. | } % bar > 67,68 > > af'8[ af gf f bf af ] | > gf[bf \grace af16 gf8 f ef df > ] | % > bar 69 That won't work - it just tells LilyPond to insert a new voice, so you get an extra bar. You must have the << >> present for simultaneous music. Regards, Neil
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user