2008/4/7 Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hmm, I don't see them as unusual, I see it more like that I bend > lilypond-book to the way I am used to when developing program and using > latex.
Yes, I meant "unusual to me" :) I should have said "ambitious" rather than "unusual". If I understand correctly, you prefer to modify existing tools instead of just adding extra macros, layers, supersets etc (such as what Reinhold did with OrchestralLily). That's an approach I found interesting, and I wanted to emphasize this difference. Anyway, I added a link to your explanations as a footnote in the article. http://valentin.villenave.info/spip.php?article62#nb3 PostScript Blue Book: thanks. I added your link in the article. About production vs unstability: thanks a lot for these explanations. I will quote you (if you don't mind) on next week's issue, as a follow-up to this week's article. Frédéric: thanks :-) You may know what the spip CMS means to us French Free people... Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
