On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Robin Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: > >> What do you think? > > Yes, well the smoke has thinned a little. > Look, when this thread started I thought I might keep an eye on what > happened to the navigation, but I would keep well away from the styling > stuff. But it's not working out that way. > > So, to styling: > I'm older than the other Patrick [1] and don't take to any darkish > background. But what I think is more radical than your rework: > G The TOC panel needs no title area (I'm repeating myself)
I'm still experimenting with this. :-) I've created another design with a color palette that passes the W3C Web Content Accessibility guidelines for color contrast: http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/start-alt-alt.html http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/lilypond-alt-alt-index.html http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/internals-alt-alt.html http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/snippets-alt-alt.html The blue links are very close to pure blue (#00F), which is a little bit intense, but there aren't very many blues that pass the guidelines. What does everyone think about this? Are there any colors from this design that you like more than those from the previous design? Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
