Patrick McCarty wrote:
I'm still experimenting with this. :-) I've created another design with a color palette that passes the W3C Web Content Accessibility guidelines for color contrast: http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/start-alt-alt.html http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/lilypond-alt-alt-index.html http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/internals-alt-alt.html http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/snippets-alt-alt.html The blue links are very close to pure blue (#00F), which is a little bit intense, but there aren't very many blues that pass the guidelines. What does everyone think about this? Are there any colors from this design that you like more than those from the previous design?
Overall, LGTM, but yes, the blue links are a bit intense against the green background. #0030B8 might be more like what you want. Or you could try something more blue-green than just blue, e.g. #006078 (which still meets the requirements for WCAG 1.0 and 2.0).
My $0.02 (Australian, and so worth even less! ;-) Brett _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user