On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For such a link-heavy document, #1a1aaa should still meet the spirit > of the w3 guidelines without making the links leap off the page to > such an extent. What do you think?
This color is definitely better. Thanks. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Brett Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Overall, LGTM, but yes, the blue links are a bit intense against the green > background. #0030B8 might be more like what you want. Or you could try > something more blue-green than just blue, e.g. #006078 (which still meets > the requirements for WCAG 1.0 and 2.0). I like #006078 a lot. It blends with the other colors very well. I'll wait to see if there are any more responses before I change anything. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
